Please correct my ignorance, but didn’t Marx think Capitalism wouldn’t last this long?

I mean a slaver does work, it’s just that job shouldn’t exist in the first place.

Maybe I should say “critical of algorithms”. The point is it’s not engineered to "maximize engagement "

Put the AI critique aside for a moment. Many people on lemmy dont like algorithms managing their feed. There’s probably a big overlap between people who are pervasively sensitive to dark algorithms and people who perceive AI as a dark algorithm parlor trick .

My city is talking about privatizing the libraries…

You can place bets on the death of democracy on polymarket but can’t place bets on the death of CEOs. Kind of makes you think 🤔

Hell, that sounds like actual leadership

We wouldn’t even call it AI anything then. The whole framing as it is now is to undermine creative work. It’s hard to imagine how it would even remotely resemble what it is now, a cold reading con.

Do you think Musk is making good faith arguments, and if so, what are they?

To deny the difference is to deny what makes the spectacle compelling

Certainly the lesser of two evils

Depends if you want to filter out phobic institutions

Those psychologists are worth 300 billion it seems

I think for many Accelerationism is speaking towards the capital transformations of society,
not the decline of empire. Even so, Trump is the accelerationist choice

Emotions aside, is their assessment of events incorrect? Harris is a more sane war hawk, recognizing that doesn’t make you an accelerationist.

My first set was aluminum, and I got it from IKEA

Good point. Now I imagine someone trying to pass the turing test by having their bot pretend to be a sales person.

I guess a certain country is using LLMs to try to engage people 1:1 to change their opinions of said country.

Came across this today: the purpose of a system is what it does. Based on that I would say the purpose of Claude was to make mistakes and get my coworker fired.

Which is why the comparison is based on rate …