Mate, focus (and would you please avoid shoving advice and links when not openly asked?!):
90 percent efficiency claim is directly in the OP.
The number can even be confirmed at the press release by Porsche (which boldly claims charging efficiency to be “over 90 percent”).
Focus and keep the number in your mind (the number found BOTH in the OP and confirmed at the Porsce’s press release) while trying to explain where the losses do take place.
I totally understand, that losses do happen when the electricity is converted first to DC and then back to high freq.AC and during the inductive charging itself.
This is expected and is a convenience tax of sorts (getting rid of cables and plugs) and yet, it’s less efficient than plugging directly.
Once again, only 90℅ efficient.
I don’t have the crayons to explain it to you any simpler 8)
Mate, focus (and would you please avoid shoving advice and links when not openly asked?!): 90 percent efficiency claim is directly in the OP.
Mate, focus. I did not dispute this number. I address it directly, in the comment you replied to. Come back when you have facts instead of just personal insults.
If you fail to understand what’s been discussed and compared to (i.e., wireless vs wired charging)
and yet keep your arrogant stance towards others (in the now deleted comment literally you_were yelling at someone to shut their mouth look this stuff up before starting to write about it
or another arrogant “have a web search” thrown randomly at me),
then why would you act surprised at insults as a response to your regular toxic behaviour?!
Mate, focus (and would you please avoid shoving advice and links when not openly asked?!): 90 percent efficiency claim is directly in the OP.
The number can even be confirmed at the press release by Porsche (which boldly claims charging efficiency to be “over 90 percent”).
Focus and keep the number in your mind (the number found BOTH in the OP and confirmed at the Porsce’s press release) while trying to explain where the losses do take place.
I totally understand, that losses do happen when the electricity is converted first to DC and then back to high freq.AC and during the inductive charging itself.
This is expected and is a convenience tax of sorts (getting rid of cables and plugs) and yet, it’s less efficient than plugging directly. Once again, only 90℅ efficient.
I don’t have the crayons to explain it to you any simpler 8)
Mate, focus. I did not dispute this number. I address it directly, in the comment you replied to. Come back when you have facts instead of just personal insults.
deleted by creator
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
Removed by mod
deleted by creator
Learn to read. Or don’t, I even included a pretty picture for you.
If you fail to understand what’s been discussed and compared to (i.e., wireless vs wired charging)
and yet keep your arrogant stance towards others (
in the now deleted comment literally you_were yelling at someone toshut their mouthlook this stuff up before starting to write about itor another arrogant “have a web search” thrown randomly at me),
then why would you act surprised at insults as a response to your regular toxic behaviour?!
Okay so now you’ve graduated from personal insults to just making shit up so you’re being blocked now, goodbye.
That is very Trump of you, shouting “fake news!” whenever been caught red-handed and shutting/blocking.
Ok, bye.