Mozilla once again notices that, in spite of the lavish salaries they heap upon their techbro executives, Firefox’s userbase continues to dwindle. Could this be because they don’t operate a monolithic surveillance advertising racket? Or maybe it’s because the corners in the UI aren’t round enough.

https://www.firefox.com/en-US/whatsnew/157/

Choice quote from that interview, which was important enough to get a big box in the release notes too:

We are bringing back compact mode as well

We removed it for absolutely no goddamn fucking reason, despite numerous objections, and now we’re bringing it back! This is called ‘listening’, you see. We are very dependable can definitely be relied upon to provide a stable browser that you won’t have to worry about.

Somehow those executives just can’t work out that unless you can advertise Firefox in all of the search engines and youtubes and gmails and docs and drives and whatever the fuck and preinstall it on all the phones, the Chrome users will not come. “Ooh shiny” is the least of anyone’s concerns.

  • self@awful.systems
    shield
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    17 days ago

    the worst part of using Firefox is mozilla

    the second worst part is mozilla fans

    • gh0stcassette@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 days ago

      This is why I use Zen. I don’t even care about most of the extra features, I just like not having to disable the sponsored shortcuts and stupid pocket articles on my new tab page every time I install the browser

  • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    18 days ago

    Duh. Obviously the logo is what’s wrong, better redesign that too.

    No, wait, it needs AI!

    No, wait, it needs to tell me about some VPN.


    Support the specifications, be secure. Perhaps try that.

  • Hadriscus@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    17 days ago

    I got the update today and I’m so tired boss. We had almost settled on something visually calm and organized, and leeeettzzzgooooo back to floaty rounded shit with no choice left to the user !

    Blender does interface right, please for the love of Cthulhu take some inspiration: it’s got a “roundedness” property for every UI widget that goes from perfectly square to perfectly round, a “widget emboss” property that can be tuned to your liking or disabled entirely, a “widget underline” property, it lets you disable button decorations as well so your toolbars are only floating icons, etc. Every combination is possible and it’s very easy to tune. Please do something like that and never touch it again.

  • robador51@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    17 days ago

    I absolutely get the Mozilla hate. What I don’t get is the dwindling numbers. I recently had to switch from Zen back to Firefox on my corporate laptop due to policy. Firefox really still is an excellent browser and would recommend it over Chrome. I occasionally have to open chrome and that’s starting to feel more and more like explorer.

    • rhamph@awful.systemsOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      17 days ago

      What I don’t get is the dwindling numbers.

      Mozilla do not operate a pervasive network of internet monopolies that can relentlessly push for Firefox adoption and sabotage compatibility of other browsers. If Mozilla had any sense, they might dedicate some more budget to advocating antitrust and campaigning other counter-monopolistic policies, but instead… they want to make the corners rounder. And flip back and forth on supporting a compact layout, while deliberating over whether they need more AI or even more AI.

  • istewart@awful.systems
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    17 days ago

    Why on EARTH did they move the FUCKING BACK BUTTON and replace it in its prior position with some FUCKING BULLSHIT USELESS sidebar button

    If I give up and become a supervillain, my primary hand-to-hand combat weapon will be a copy of the Macintosh Human Interface Guidelines laser-etched onto stainless steel plates and somehow bound in a physicalized representation of the tattered remains of these peoples’ abandoned dignity

    • lawks@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 days ago

      At least you can remove all the sidebar crap: right-click > remove from toolbar.

      I really didn’t need rounded everything, not every tool needs to be Fisher-Priced.

    • rhamph@awful.systemsOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 days ago

      There are few parts I thought about sneering about in individual comments, but I think there are… enough here.

      Still, one particularly galling part was this remark by the author:

      Firefox’s new redesign is—at least to me—a welcome one. It no longer looks like a browser from 2015.

      What on earth does a ‘browser from 2015’ look like? That was barely a decade ago! You mean an interface that still managed to function rather than whatever inscrutable nonsense the phone OSes are doing this week? Who wants software that has to be completely redesigned every five years?

  • Undaunted@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    18 days ago

    I really can’t wait for Servo to get into a usable state and have alternative browsers being build on top of that.

    • Squizzy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      17 days ago

      How do I start using this, is it something an end user can support through adoption?

      • lime!@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 days ago

        no, it’s very much not up to web standards yet. it has a super fast html renderer and css engine that support something like 70% of properties, a very barebones js runtime that has basically no browser apis, and a frontend that (i think) only takes urls via command-line.

        • Jayjader@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          17 days ago

          Honestly that description kinda makes me want to target servo for all of my hobby browser-backed UIs. Html5 with forms can do a surprising amount (albeit not always as effortlessly as just including a JavaScript library) - though I expect something like IndexedDB isn’t at all available?

          EDIT: well, the servo repo has a bunch of code in a storage/engines/indexeddb folder, but the repo aussi has about 30 open issues relating to “IndexedDB” in one way or another.

        • Squizzy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          17 days ago

          The less APIs the better, some of the information my phone is giving out currently to evwry site I visit is ridiculous

          • lime!@feddit.nu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            17 days ago

            some of them are, y’know, needed for the sites to do anything at all.

  • Sina@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    17 days ago

    What Firefox needs is to fire everyone responsible for the UX, if they have such people on their payroll & put all their ehm “limited” resources on improving performance & some effort is also needed to become more Chromium compatible, perhaps even on a site by site basis. Alas as long as Google is the main revenue source for the project, all this is a pipe dream.

    Firefox never had other issues. Poor performance -especially JS- compared to Chromium & some websites just don’t work anymore.

  • WolvenSpectre@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 days ago

    Opera 12 started to do this. China owns it now and it is based on Chromium. A couple of Open Source browsers did it for the same reason later and lost users like their was orbital bombardment hitting their project. Grab a brain… it is not the design language that makes Chrome so successful and if you look and act like them, well users are just going to use them.

    • Jacob Alexander Tice@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      16 days ago

      Your chain of causality is comically nonsensical. First of all, Opera isn’t owned “by China,” it’s a publicly traded company whose largest shareholder happens to be Chinese. The company’s still Norwegian. Second of all, that didn’t happen until 2016. Opera Software ASA (now Otello ASA) are the ones who switched to Chromium 3 years before that because they had decided that Presto couldn’t compete with WebKit anymore. I disagree with that decision but that’s what happened.

      • Sina@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 days ago

        To follow up on this, the update hit my LibreWolf today & my css is mildly broken, but I’m kind of at a loss as to how to fix it and I dislike Nova.