• Maiq@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      19 days ago

      B (Berkeley), S (Software), D (Distribution).

      A Unix based OS, developed at Berkeley.

      • degen@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        19 days ago

        Technically yes, but there’s a lot more to it lol

        It’s a bit like if you separated two twins and raised them in isolation to study nature vs nurture

        • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          19 days ago

          So, there are a couple of things. Here is where I push up my glasses and say “well–ahem–”

          First, true, BSD is not itself Unix. That specific OS (which began with the PDP-7 Operating System in the late 1960s) really only existed until the late 80s or early 90s, when Bell Labs stopped working on it.

          However, it is literally Unix-based. The first version of BSD was forked (as we’d call it today) from the Research Unix source code at UC Berkeley. Since then, the various BSD derivatives and distros have all iterated upon or forked from that initial Unix code. I don’t think any are officially registered as SUS systems (but there are only a handful that are), which means that a pedant would say that BSD is technically “Unix-like.”

          But it is based on Unix, it’s a part of the Unix family, just like Windows 11 is part of the NT family. MacOS is also part of the Unix family (I think it might be or used to have been SUS-registered, actually). Linux isn’t, and I think I remember hearing that Torvalds didn’t even use the Research Unix source code to write the Linux kernel originally, but it does follow a lot of the SUS spec and so is definitely Unix-like.

          • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            19 days ago

            Torvalds was inspired by Minix (which was in turn inspired by UNIX) but didn’t follow Tannenbaum’s micro-kernel model.

          • degen@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            19 days ago

            We got a historian over here! Lol Twins is a bit strong as a descriptor but the spirit of it might be apt enough.

            I wish I had learned more about BSD before getting so ingrained in Linux. Not because one is “better” or anything. They’re just two different worlds. I’m not sure I have the bandwidth to explore it the way I’d like to, like I did with Linux.

            But who knows, it’s just one step more than all the distro and setup hopping I’ve done over the years.

        • neidu4@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          19 days ago

          In a strictly semantic way it is technically true; It is the basic building block of what later became the building block of macos.

          Responded to the wrong person.


          What I meant to write here was: I’ve used both linux and freebsd, and nature vs nature holds true, I th8nk. But I am unsure which one is which.

          • degen@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            19 days ago

            I didn’t mean that either results specifically from nature or nurture, but that there’s a lot of nuance between the two that makes me think of that kind of “forbidden experiment”.

            It’s the same fabric as any human culture, I suppose, which is endlessly fascinating.

    • neidu4@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      19 days ago

      A separate family of operating systems. It’s a direct decendant of the old UNIX. FreeBSD, OpenBSD and NetBSD are the most common distributions.

      It shares a lot of the same userspace tools as Linux (the GNUserspace, if you will), so if you’re used to the command line, a lot will seem familiar at a first glance. However, the underlying mechanisms can feel a bit strange at first once you try it out.

      I used FreeBSD as my daily driver back in the day, but now I’m also on Mint, mostly because I used linux more at work.

      I’ve been meaning to check out BSD these days to see how far it’s come since I last used it 20ish years ago, I just haven’t gotten around to it.

      I also remember hearing someone say that there are two things from Berkley that messes with your head: BSD and LSD.

      • rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 days ago

        What the fuck did you just fucking say to me, you little bitch? I’ll have you know I graduated top of my class at Berkeley, and I’ve been involved in numerous secret raids on GNU, and I have over 300 confirmed kills. I am trained in al-gore-rhythm warfare and I’m the top sniper in the entire FOSS ecosystem. You are nothing to me but just another target. I will wipe you the fuck out with precision the likes of which has never been seen before on this Earth, mark my fucking words. You think you can get away with saying that shit to me over the Internet? Think again, fucker. As we speak I am contacting my secret network of spies across the USA and your IP is being traced right now so you better prepare for the storm, maggot. The storm that wipes out the pathetic little thing you call your life. You’re fucking dead, kid. I can be anywhere, anytime, and I can kill you in over seven hundred ways, and that’s just with my bare hands. Not only am I extensively trained in unarmed combat, but I have access to the entire arsenal of the United States Marine Corps and I will use it to its full extent to wipe your miserable ass off the face of the continent, you little shit. If only you could have known what unholy retribution your little “clever” comment was about to bring down upon you, maybe you would have held your fucking tongue. But you couldn’t, you didn’t, and now you’re paying the price, you goddamn idiot. I will shit fury all over you and you will drown in it. You’re fucking dead, kiddo

      • Kangae_Hishiryo@scribe.disroot.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        19 days ago

        It’s weird to think about it and notice that’s basically true.

        MacOS is closed-sourced Darwin, which is itself a descendant of BSD.

        Omg, license laundering goes brrr.

      • neidu4@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        19 days ago

        In a strictly semantic way it is technically true; It is the basic building block of what later became the basic building block of macos

    • diaphragmwp@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      19 days ago

      Okay, imagine Linux. But it’s (most of) the whole thing developed at once rather than just the kernel and tools separately.

      AND:

      • GNU licenses: companies use code and contribute because it may help
      • BSD licenses: companies that use code shouldn’t contribute because it sucks