• rozodru@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    25 days ago

    let them. Seriously, let them do it.

    And when the day comes, and it will, when something is submitted and approved and breaks shit then people can turn to the devs and Linus and say “I told you so.”

    my decision a few months ago to start daily driving BSD doesn’t seem to be a bad one.

    • refalo@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      25 days ago

      FreeBSD and OpenBSD both allow AI and contain AI-generated code. NetBSD requires prior approval but doesn’t outright ban it.

    • who@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      25 days ago

      when something is submitted and approved and breaks shit

      Not to defend AI, but this already happens in the kernel, often. It has been this way since long before LLMs were around.

    • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      25 days ago

      then people can turn to the devs and Linus and say “I told you so.”

      I bet his response will be an email with a dozen variations of “fuck you for insinuating that I have any responsibility, I didn’t approve that specific commit, it’s all <approver>'s fault who is a fucking imbecile”