• OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    26 days ago

    Plants are living things too that we raise, exploit, systematically molest and slaughter, do vegans not care about that?

    Even from that perspective, do you not understand that we have to kill way more plants to feed to animals to then eat than we would eating the plants directly?

    • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      26 days ago

      I understand that, and I understand the overall personal health and societal benefits of reducing meat consumption. I proposed an upcoming alternative that wouldn’t require nearly any plant consumption, still all the power to you for making conscious decisions to reduce the environmental impact of meeting your needs if you practice veganism. Though for this post, what I’m doing here is applying the idea of moral circle expansion to demonstrate that people have different benchmarks to what they care about, which can be just humans, humans and animals, or also including plants and other organisms, to show that OP’s assertion that veganism = leftism is an incorrect blanket statement.

      • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        26 days ago

        And I’m demonstrating that that’s nonsense. The way to prevent harm to plants is by going vegan. “I won’t go vegan because I don’t want to harm plants” is always a bad faith (or at best uninformed argument).

        • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          26 days ago

          I’m not saying I won’t or one shouldn’t be vegan because of this, I’m saying the equating of leftism and veganism is wrong because of this.

          • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            26 days ago

            Nothing is “because of this” because “this” is complete and utter nonsense. How can nonsense prove anything wrong?

            • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              26 days ago

              You’re free to consider what I wrote as nonsense if you so wish. (Edit: The “simple objective fact” you wrote below I understand to be true as well, so there’s no need for us to argue any further about it.) Have an excellent day.

              • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                26 days ago

                It’s not that “I consider it to be” nonsense. It is, objectively, nonsense.

                It’s a simple, objective fact that feeding animals to eat causes more harm to plants than just eating plants.