Worst part of all of this is that, IF they sincerely believed that Trump won in 2020, or that Trump could legally run for a third term, then they would answer honestly and make the legal argument supporting their position. They were asked the question under oath and they refused to answer because they know that they do not have a legitimate legal defense for their partisan positions, and they will rule in favor of Trump regardless of the law.
Worst part of all of this is that, IF they sincerely believed that Trump won in 2020, or that Trump could legally run for a third term, then they would answer honestly and make the legal argument supporting their position. They were asked the question under oath and they refused to answer because they know that they do not have a legitimate legal defense for their partisan positions, and they will rule in favor of Trump regardless of the law.
The difference between being idiots and willingly evil.
Well, being “just” an idiot isn’t really an option for a SCOTUS judge.