• Gsus4@mander.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      But how do you know that? I don’t know what the reputable and predatory nutrition journals are.

      • Hirom@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        It’s not always obvious. Science journalists should know.

        Science Daily, which is linked here, is well rated. cf https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/science-daily/ So you can hardly be blamed here. But this article appears to be bad reporting.

        This article makes or repeat bold claims about treating a medical condition from an in-vitro experiment, without any measurement of the effect on actual humans. Not an expert, but my understanding is a clinical trial is necessary to draw conclusion about the effect on a medical condition in human.

        Although additional studies in animals and humans are needed to confirm these effects, this work provides a clearer explanation of how everyday foods and natural compounds may help regulate chronic inflammation. Over time, this could play an important role in supporting long-term health.

        Hopefully what they saw with a few cells in vitro can help prepare a medical trial with proprer controls. If and when such trial occurs, then maybe it’ll be possible to draw early conclusions about a (probable) effect on medical conditions.