• SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Copper has more mass, heat capacity, and thermal conductivity per litre.

    Is aluminium actually more effective as a dissipation surface? I hadn’t heard that.

    • fx242@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Copper is better conductor but it’s worse at dissipation. Do the experience yourself, heat a block of each and then touch them afterwards.

        • fx242@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          Maybe you’re right, but I remember than in the 2000s I’ve had identical cpu heatsinks in both copper/aluminum versions, and the aluminum one had better performance. And then they started to make hybrid ones, stating that the copper part was to allow rapid heat transference and the aluminum parts to improve dissipation. But maybe it was all marketing.

          • Schmuppes@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Aluminium is significantly cheaper, that’s why they make coolers with a copper base and alu fins. It’s a good compromise.