• twinnie@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    35 minutes ago

    I read the article it says the lobbying organisation behind air con, etc, doesn’t actually want this. They’d rather investment went towards newer tech as supplies of the old materials are dwindling.

  • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 hours ago

    If no one else joins them then wouldn’t systems made in the US be difficult to export to any developed countries?

  • Zahille7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Like the whole administration’s motto/mission statement is literally just “Fuck you, that’s why.”

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      This set of gases was developed because they don’t deplete the ozone so much, but they’re incredibly potent greenhouse gases, which is why there’s an effort to end their use.

      • spidermanchild@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Right. One issue is that the US’s glidepath towards low GWP includes significant HFO usage (which is a PFAS) rather than speedrunning natural refrigerants which are the only sustainable long term solution. So we’ll likely have more warming, but less PFAS as a result of this, along with higher costs and more uncertainty. The focus needs to be on natural refrigerants though long term.