ickplant@lemmy.world to WomensStuff@piefed.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 5 days ago"Strong 1950s family unit" 🤢lemmy.worldimagemessage-square48linkfedilinkarrow-up1718arrow-down10
arrow-up1718arrow-down1image"Strong 1950s family unit" 🤢lemmy.worldickplant@lemmy.world to WomensStuff@piefed.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 5 days agomessage-square48linkfedilink
minus-squareRedGreenBlue@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up27·5 days agoIt’s good for both parties of a marriage that there is a way out.
minus-squareBluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·5 days agoNot when one party had state backing to have their spouse locked into an insane asylum is she asked for a divorce
minus-squareJaycifer@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·5 days agoThen she didn’t really have a way out, did she?
minus-squareBluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 days agoTrue, i think we’re agreeing, “divorce” could and often is simply a way to give men a unilateral exit while denying that to women.
minus-squareWren@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·5 days agoBut significantly better for one group over the other. The group we’re talking about. Because this is a women’s community.
It’s good for both parties of a marriage that there is a way out.
Not when one party had state backing to have their spouse locked into an insane asylum is she asked for a divorce
Then she didn’t really have a way out, did she?
True, i think we’re agreeing, “divorce” could and often is simply a way to give men a unilateral exit while denying that to women.
But significantly better for one group over the other. The group we’re talking about. Because this is a women’s community.