- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
If anyone else was curious what the mag release mechanism looks like

Notes From Original OP:
I got to shoot one of these earlier this month. One of the first things I noticed was how ergonomically natural it felt to reload — the low capacity makes the magazine short, so you instinctively cup it from the bottom, which brings your hands right over the mag release. Because they insert straight in and out rather than rocking forward, you’re unlikely to fumble them. The clothes hanger-style pins on the mag also make it easy to clip extra mags to your pockets or belts.
…and yet, this also seems like one of the dumbest and most unnecessary design choices. Now magazines are will be much more complex to manufacture, there’s zero chance of compatibility with other rifles (even of the same caliber, as many MAS-49s were converted to 7.62 NATO), and they’re harder to store in regular pouches.
Indeed, no one will question the Frenchness of the engineers behind this.
@PugJesus this is what happens when you let the french engineer anything
also, as a rule, never submit to french trials unless you’re d’assault
because they have an ironclad track record of taking all the ideas and trade secrets, dismissing the designers without even a ‘merci’, and then building their own frankenmonster
then they sit on it until the germans steal it from them
and then the germans overcomplicate it
This feels like a highly specific reference to an IRL situation.
The main issue i see is how sturdy is that external clothespin? I feel like the first time i dive for cover those things are going to get bent to all hell and i won’t be able to seat my magazine anymore.
Schmidt-Rubin K-31 moment




