• PugJesus@piefed.socialOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    16 days ago

    Notes From Original OP:

    I got to shoot one of these earlier this month. One of the first things I noticed was how ergonomically natural it felt to reload — the low capacity makes the magazine short, so you instinctively cup it from the bottom, which brings your hands right over the mag release. Because they insert straight in and out rather than rocking forward, you’re unlikely to fumble them. The clothes hanger-style pins on the mag also make it easy to clip extra mags to your pockets or belts.

    …and yet, this also seems like one of the dumbest and most unnecessary design choices. Now magazines are will be much more complex to manufacture, there’s zero chance of compatibility with other rifles (even of the same caliber, as many MAS-49s were converted to 7.62 NATO), and they’re harder to store in regular pouches.

    Indeed, no one will question the Frenchness of the engineers behind this.

  • Becca@mstdn.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 days ago

    @PugJesus this is what happens when you let the french engineer anything

    also, as a rule, never submit to french trials unless you’re d’assault

    because they have an ironclad track record of taking all the ideas and trade secrets, dismissing the designers without even a ‘merci’, and then building their own frankenmonster

    then they sit on it until the germans steal it from them

    and then the germans overcomplicate it

  • teft@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    16 days ago

    The main issue i see is how sturdy is that external clothespin? I feel like the first time i dive for cover those things are going to get bent to all hell and i won’t be able to seat my magazine anymore.