You mean capitalist dictatorship / rule by the rich. We should not allow the liberals to call their sham system / theatre piece of stacked elections picked by the rich, a “democracy”.
If you believe in democracy, personal rights, and capitalism
🎼 One of these things 🎶 Is not like the other 🎶
🎼 One of these things 🎶 Is not like its brother 🎶
given how much modern ‘conservatives’ hate democracy and personal rights
“This far and no further” politics is a pox on conservatives and liberals alike. This is one of the reasons you see Gavin Newsom fucking around with TERFs in the name of fairness in college athletics. Its one of the reasons why so many people soured on Barack Obama inside his first term.
“Personal Rights” always seem to terminate at the edge of popular consensus.
How does, say, China’s model of Whole Process People’s Democracy, a form of democracy based on consultative democracy, flow from classical liberalism? Liberal models of voting for parties or single representatives don’t map at all to China’s form of democracy, yet China is consistently seen as more democratic by its own citizens than liberal democracies are by their own citizens:
These are stark differences and are reflective of Marxism as opposed to liberalism.
If you believe in democracy, personal rights, and capitalism … congrats, you’re a liberal.
(Though, given how much modern ‘conseravtives’ hate democracy and personal rights, a lot of them aren’t really liberal anymore. They’re fascist.)
You mean capitalist dictatorship / rule by the rich. We should not allow the liberals to call their sham system / theatre piece of stacked elections picked by the rich, a “democracy”.
“Personal rights” too, which includes the ownership of private property, which is definitely not what socialists support
🎼 One of these things 🎶 Is not like the other 🎶
🎼 One of these things 🎶 Is not like its brother 🎶
“This far and no further” politics is a pox on conservatives and liberals alike. This is one of the reasons you see Gavin Newsom fucking around with TERFs in the name of fairness in college athletics. Its one of the reasons why so many people soured on Barack Obama inside his first term.
“Personal Rights” always seem to terminate at the edge of popular consensus.
*bourgeois democracy (people’s democracies are good)
All forms of democracy are liberal types of governance.
Nope, socialist democracy exists and is a break from individualist styles of democracy espoused by liberalism.
Typical .world lib doesn’t understand what they’re talking about.
It’s fully within the principles of self-governance and communal determination which are core tenets and flow from classical liberalism.
Try again.
So communists are liberals?
How does, say, China’s model of Whole Process People’s Democracy, a form of democracy based on consultative democracy, flow from classical liberalism? Liberal models of voting for parties or single representatives don’t map at all to China’s form of democracy, yet China is consistently seen as more democratic by its own citizens than liberal democracies are by their own citizens:
These are stark differences and are reflective of Marxism as opposed to liberalism.