In particular I’m not sure if my “woke cat” comics should have the box checked for future posts.

Written by me, and then I take multiple chat bot images and make manual corrections and edits in GIMP to get the comic panels.

So if I had to pick yes or no to “is it AI generated?” I’d say “no”

But I’m not sure if the “AI generated” check box is equivalent to that question, or more like “does it contain auto generated content?” which would be “yes”

Edit - will absolutely not be using the check box for these comics due to a fucked up reply that got too many upvotes

  • poVoq@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    The checkbox is like the NSFW checkbox, so you should absolutely mark things that contain generated imagery. It is not about how you feel about it but to warn others who have stricter requirements.

  • prettybunnys@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    So I guess what we all take from this is OP is the kinda person that asks if we’re all ok if he shits in the pool then after we all say “no thank you” they get mad and say they’re gonna do it anyways.

    • Bubs@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Right?! Lol.

      Every reply OP has made has either been “Your lying and wrong” or “I don’t like you, so I’m gonna ignore you”.

      They asked for the community’s opinion about a legit question and got all butt-hurt that they didn’t like the answers.

      I love when people act like this on Lemmy because two reasons: It’s hella entertaining, and it points a flashing neon arrow at who to block to make your Lemmy better.

  • Asetru@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Written by me, and then I take multiple chat bot images and make manual corrections and edits in GIMP to get the comic panels.

    So if I had to pick yes or no to “is it AI generated?” I’d say “no”

    Bloody hell… That’s AI generated and I’d feel pissed if somebody said it wasn’t so it wouldn’t filter from my feed.

    You can’t just slop your artwork together, fix the messed up fingers and then say because you drew three lines yourself it’s no longer AI. If it has AI in there, it’s AI. It’s either done without AI or it’s AI.

  • Snoopy@tarte.nuage-libre.fr
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    People are against ai for ethical reasons for example :

    • Pollution. You use gpu and data center to generate an image. Rare metal, electricity
    • Author protection. Yes we can’t alway pay for artist and the outcome will be less paid work. And most of picture that were feed to ai come from internet.
    • AI is mostly a tool the feed users what they want to hear. Opinion manipulation from big tech or governement. For example China use deepseek against Taiwan. Grok against “woke”…

    So people do have a right to identify AI generated content.

    Personal opinion for a distant futur :

    My worst fear is that we will come to a point where we won’t be able to distinguish AI generated content.

    Then we will lose because we will have no meant to protect against it. So it will create some new movement as no tech or cooptation social network as scuttlebutt.nz, p2p and federated network will close.

    • keepthepace@tarte.nuage-libre.fr
      link
      fedilink
      Français
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Pollution. You use gpu and data center to generate an image. Rare metal, electricity

      You use less resources generating an image than using photoshop for a few minutes

      Author protection. Yes we can’t alway pay for artist and the outcome will be less paid work. And most of picture that were feed to ai come from internet.

      Authors often use references from internet as well. The contribution is similar.

      AI is mostly a tool the feed users what they want to hear

      LLMs and image generators are different.