• Susaga@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    …That post is blatant misinformation. If you aren’t allowed to downvote misinformation, then what ARE you allowed to downvote?

    • flamingos-cant (hopepunk arc)@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Sure, it’s a bad article that relies on iffy reasoning, but it manages to dress that up enough that I can see why someone might be duped by it. And it hardly seems fair to be this vitriolic about someone being misinformed and enforcing their comm rules when no actually points out what’s wrong with what’s been posted or links to actual numbers, rather than guesstimations of the article author.

      • Susaga@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        So why is the admin punishing people for not being duped by it? If you’re told it’s misinformation, and you go out of your way to defend it, then you’re not duped. You’re part of the misinformation. And an admin using admin powers to support that misinformation is just propoganda.

        • flamingos-cant (hopepunk arc)@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          How is just downvoting something telling someone a post is misinformation? People downvote stuff over the most random crap here. Also, they didn’t use admin powers, no site bans were handed out only 3 month comm bans.

          • Susaga@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Unless you sort by new, a downvote lowers visibility of a post, thus preventing people from being exposed to misinformation. It also frames the article as something most people disapprove of, making it less likely people will believe the article uncritically. Separately, there were comments telling the admin the article was inaccurate, and the admin defended the post.

            Please stop going out of your way to defend misinformation.