• explodicle@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    7 days ago

    Steelman argument: he’s speaking about militaries in general, not suggesting that one country disarms first.

    If hypothetically Ukraine and Russia both disarmed at the same time, that would be wonderful.

      • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        We don’t??? Shit! Now we can’t talk about abstract concepts without getting dragged into irrelevant details.

        • bier@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Have you seen what happens to animal species that evolve on some island and one day an non native exotic animal is introduced? In a lot of cases that animal goes extinct. Even if we would all magically agree to never attack other counties and all dissolve our army’s, only 1 country has to break the packt and we all have a real chance to be invaded. If we are doing imaginary systems, I would suggest a system where we all agree to respect current borders and never invade and all also agree to fight any country that breaks the rule. Sort of a more global and more elaborate NATO.