cannedtuna@lemmy.world to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 months agoI must con(FeS₂), this sparked a laughlemmy.worldimagemessage-square113linkfedilinkarrow-up1943arrow-down126
arrow-up1917arrow-down1imageI must con(FeS₂), this sparked a laughlemmy.worldcannedtuna@lemmy.world to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square113linkfedilink
minus-squarebitteroldcoot@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up43·2 months agoWell it’s about time someone picked up on that one. It was low hanging fruit.
minus-squarejustaman123@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up24arrow-down1·2 months ago For some reason your comment makes me think of this
minus-squareunderscores@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 months agowould it be more grammatically correct if he said “with enough derogation”?
minus-squarejustaman123@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoYes, but I think that playing with the grammar is part of the joke, as if derogatory is quantifiable.
minus-squareLemminary@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 months agoI’m about to slap you both. For the lulz.
minus-squareSlovene85@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 months agoLike The Three Stooges.
Well it’s about time someone picked up on that one. It was low hanging fruit.
For some reason your comment makes me think of this
would it be more grammatically correct if he said “with enough derogation”?
Yes, but I think that playing with the grammar is part of the joke, as if derogatory is quantifiable.
I’m about to slap you both. For the lulz.
Like The Three Stooges.
Ahem… “too”.