So nuclear plants are both too fragile to accept a couple degrees increase in the river water AND are polluting thermal waste (in addition to radioactive waste).
You really think this is an argument-winner?
Especially in a world where wind and solar power is plentiful and becoming more so?
So nuclear plants are both too fragile to accept a couple degrees increase in the river water AND are polluting thermal waste (in addition to radioactive waste).
You really think this is an argument-winner?
Especially in a world where wind and solar power is plentiful and becoming more so?
No, my argument is that you got your facts wrong about what happened here and for what purpose.
If you read my comments again, you’ll note I didn’t dispute or argue any notions on how green nuclear energy really is.
You’re right. I can’t make a better argument for shutting down nuclear plants than you have.