For more than half a century, the United States treated the protection of habitat as part of protecting endangered wildlife. The Endangered Species Act prohibited killing protected wildlife, and the government interpreted that protection to include severe damage to the habitat needed for feeding, breeding, and shelter. A developer could violate the act by removing […]
That is so wild. How does conserving the habitat not count as necessary for protecting the species? How could anyone justify this decision?
There are profits to be made, who cares about killing off all life on the planet? - capitalists
it’s why Tom Murphy keeps on about the sixth mass extinction
https://dothemath.ucsd.edu/
Greed.