• Davel23@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    23 days ago

    While I would have loved to see it happen, arresting a world leader while in the country for a UN General Assembly dangerously undermines that body’s function.

    • ryannathans@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      23 days ago

      The UN headquarters agreement grants immunity to world leaders when travelling to New York for these events

          • BrikoX@lemmy.zipOPM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            21 days ago

            True, but it does have Permanent Observer State status. But it’s a moot argument either way as the immunity given by treaty explicitly extends to anyone invited by the UN to conduct “official business”.

        • ryannathans@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          23 days ago

          It is unclear, however, if the US move to deny or revoke visas complies with that document

          • BrikoX@lemmy.zipOPM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            23 days ago

            Use full quote from the article and see how stupid that sounds.

            It is unclear, however, if the US move to deny or revoke visas complies with that document, which outlines that foreign officials’ attendance in New York should not be impeded by the US, “irrespective of the relations” between their respective governments and the US.

            • ryannathans@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              23 days ago

              Your argument is that if the US govt breaks their own law to prosecute their ally who has immunity then they can do it?

              Sure, people can do whatever they want at the end of the day and this is meaningless time waste

    • FishLake@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      23 days ago

      But capturing them from within their own country and charging them with crimes in your country’s legal system is okay.

      • brewery@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        23 days ago

        So is waiting for them to return home and bombing their whole family, or rigging their devices with bombs and having them all go at once even if you don’t know who’s nearby

    • krashmo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      23 days ago

      I get what you’re saying but I don’t think another letter from the UN is going to accomplish anything so that feels like an empty ideal to hold to

      • luciferofastora@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 days ago

        The federal government wouldn’t write a letter though. They’d jump on the opportunity to selectively enforce international agreements against their enemy and point to the pressure from all the other countries as justification.

        Better not to risk it for the sake of briefly locking up one guy and instead keep working on things he can affect.