Jorunn (she/her)@piefed.blahaj.zoneM to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 month agoWhat some call a "call to violence" probably. also rulefiles.catbox.moeimagemessage-square87linkfedilinkarrow-up1761arrow-down18 cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1753arrow-down1imageWhat some call a "call to violence" probably. also rulefiles.catbox.moeJorunn (she/her)@piefed.blahaj.zoneM to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square87linkfedilink cross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareflandish@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·1 month agosure. yes, it’s violence because fists hit things. sure. i am saying that specifically in relation to nazis, the value of self defense makes the “violence” no longer violence when it’s used as self defense.
minus-squarewerty@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 month agoIt’s still violence and you are being ridiculous. You can say that violence against nazis is ok, you don’t need to pretend.
minus-squareflandish@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 month agoi reckon i am being a little thick. my apologies. :)
sure. yes, it’s violence because fists hit things. sure. i am saying that specifically in relation to nazis, the value of self defense makes the “violence” no longer violence when it’s used as self defense.
It’s still violence and you are being ridiculous. You can say that violence against nazis is ok, you don’t need to pretend.
i reckon i am being a little thick. my apologies. :)