m_f@discuss.onlineM to Cyanide & Happiness@discuss.onlineEnglish · 5 days ago2026-08-14discuss.onlineimagemessage-square19linkfedilinkarrow-up1384arrow-down11file-text
arrow-up1383arrow-down1image2026-08-14discuss.onlinem_f@discuss.onlineM to Cyanide & Happiness@discuss.onlineEnglish · 5 days agomessage-square19linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareTruthtwopower@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14arrow-down1·5 days agoTbh he probably never read it either. That’s why he believes in it still.
minus-squareluciferofastora@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·4 days agoNah, the issue is that you, when you read a contradiction, conclude one of the premises must be wrong. He will instead believe his understanding of the premises or his logic is wrong.
Tbh he probably never read it either. That’s why he believes in it still.
Nah, the issue is that you, when you read a contradiction, conclude one of the premises must be wrong. He will instead believe his understanding of the premises or his logic is wrong.