cross-posted from: https://scribe.disroot.org/post/11251740

“Sadly, mass-casualty terrorist ambition endures… but the terrorist threat now sits alongside strategic national security threats posed by capable states,” [says Sir Ken McCallum, the head of Britain’s security agency MI5].

{On the 25th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks in the U.S.], McCallum warns particularly of Russia and China as well as of ‘islamic terrorism’.

"This is my call to arms after 25 years: government, business, academia, and the public must treat national security not as the specialist concern of a handful of agencies, but as a shared national endeavour.”

The threat level in the UK is currently at severe, the second-highest category, meaning that an attack is highly likely. Commemorations for the 2,977 people who died in 9/11 will be marked around the world, remembering the day the world changed.

Russia’s hybrid war against the West and China’s competition over minerals and trade routes have led to increasing calls for a “whole nation” response rather than a reliance on the security services and armed forces for protection and survival.

He writes: “Contending with rising state-backed aggression – whether sabotage subcontracted to criminals, or covert interference in our democracy, or destructive cyber attacks on power stations – demands new laws as well as new tradecraft.”

Russia has used the full spectrum of attacks that he refers to against the UK in the past 15 years as well as state-sponsored murder.

“We cannot wait for the next shock to discover who owns the vulnerability, who has the authority to act, or who was supposed to pick up the phone.”

Archived

  • plyth@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    After the sudden victory in Syria I don’t write off America from that setback with Iran. We don’t know the objectives.

    China isn’t expansionary, they just seem like the reliable partner right now as USA achieves historic aura loss from Iran

    That’s why there will be war. The West will lose global control otherwise.

    • deHaga@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      We do know the objectives, every Israeli prime minister for 30 years has been asking the US to do this. None of them have been stupid enough to believe it would be a simple in and out job, 2 weeks special military operation lol.

      US has given up the rules based order. It’s a multi polar world now. US just wants the western hemisphere.

      • plyth@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        Or the US are preparing for a war with China and they solve the middle east before Iran can create chaos on the energy market when the US needs it the least.

        What is Trump e.g. doing in Azerbaijan? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armenia–Azerbaijan_peace_agreement

        That doesn’t look very western hemisphere to me.

        Also, there is no way the US can compete with China on their own, or just with South America. The US is betting on AI because they want to remain the hegemon and keep everybody else dependent.

        • deHaga@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          Trump is doing the usual.

          The 2025 agreement was mediated by Trump’s Special Envoy Steve Witkoff, who visited the region in late February. It was followed by a series of five additional visits by U.S. representatives.[91] U.S. Senator Steve Daines participated in the visit to the both countries in May.[92]

          After the agreement was signed, the U.S. administration received calls from three American companies who are interested in operation of the route

          Where is this war with China supposed to take place?

          And no, US cannot do anything alone. Alienating their allies seems a little stupid.

            • deHaga@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 days ago

              Yeah, this has been talked about for 75 years. Not going to happen.

              Trump is fighting without winning, Xi is winning without fighting.

              • plyth@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 days ago

                What should the US do instead? Escalating everything into war is the only option they have.

                • deHaga@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  The approach taken over the previous 75 years was working very well for the USA.

                  • plyth@feddit.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    5 days ago

                    The US won’t keep their technical lead forever which is the only power they have after losing industrial production to China. They have to adjust and whatever Trump does must be part of their plan to stay ahead.