

Yeah, I think you’re right and it’s unlikely that many people have such long friendships with people over entirely private media.
If you’re enjoying the hypotheticals, I’ve got another, but if they’re unhelpful/distracting, don’t feel obligated to indulge me. What if you had an open, anonymous community sharing a chain of emails, so each person joining the group would receive the email account made by the person before them and would make an email for the person joining after them? Obviously the feds could still infiltrate it, but they’d have a lot less data from any given user and they’d get the most data from the person who joins after they do, which they can’t control. Unless they monitor it 24/7 and get lucky, they wouldn’t be able to make sure every other user is a fed. That seems like it would also be relatively easy to detect, if every single time a new account joined, another immediately followed.














Yeah, I figured the prior person’s information would only be released when the new user provides the details for a valid email account. I’m (clearly) not a tech person, but that sounds relatively doable.
The problem with changing the terms is that you don’t know who’s going to join after you, so you don’t know that they want a song. You can look at that as the free market in action, but it’s also effectively a dead end for a purpose-built group.
It has also just occurred to me that people who want to commit fraud would also be interested in this, and perhaps giving them the opportunity to collect a bunch of potential blackmail ammunition is not ideal.