• kibblebits@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Well, using the word chivalry in 2026 is pretty sexist imo. The definition is more knightly in origin, with another example being men courteous to women. Clearly from another time. I think we can just retire this word—o😚OP seems to be asking for a semantic shift to an already established word. 🤷‍♂️

    • velma@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Absolutely agree on the word chivalry being outdated.

      Word evolution and etymology are always interesting topics to banter about. Chivalry clearly has a different modern definition than it’s origins. Maybe we could help redefine it further? Or come up with another way of expressing something similar.

      Like, I think women can be chivalrous. Does that inherently balance the definition or is chivalry always considered a male trait?

      • kibblebits@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I don’t think the modern definition is clear at all. Which is why we are here.

        I think the word should be decommissioned, as well as the concept of any gender treating any other gender differently than they would treat their own.

        If someone asks, “how should a man treat a woman?” The answer should always be, “like a man would treat a man.”

        Maybe I’m just too damn chivalrous. ;)

        • velma@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          I just said the modern version is clearly different, not that the definition itself is clear.

          …Do you think I’m arguing with you?

          I don’t agree that being chivalrous inherently means treating different genders differently.