• melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Kind of like honour. Standing up for those who cannot stand up for themselves. Seeing situations where help or assistance is needed and doing so. Traditionally it’s Knight’s helping damsels, but we’re in a different world and people of all stripes sometimes need a bit of a hand to set them upright again. Caring and empathy are requirements for this type of behaviour.

  • Taleya@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Putting in the effort to serve others in various ways when you don’t have to.

  • velma@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    Being treated with respect.

    Being given the benefit of the doubt.

    Being given the space to thrive and live the way I desire.

  • Kayday@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    Bad chivalry: putting women on a pedestal, and preventing them from getting down.
    Good chivalry: intentionally leaving room for women to share a space equally

      • kibblebits@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Choose a word that I can use instead of lets that has a similar meaning but doesn’t go down the direction you’re trying to take this, because that wasn’t the intention.

        • velma@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          I understood what you originally meant, for what it’s worth.

          Maybe “When a man is comfortable enough in his own masculinity that his partner being the breadwinner isn’t an issue.” or something like that.

            • ZDL@lazysoci.al
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              16 hours ago

              This weird over-sensitivity made me suspicious. So I looked. And I unsurprisingly found.

              I’m a tall male, so if you aren’t you might enjoy a lower dose more.

              Dude. It’s literally two words. Which one did you not understand?

              • kibblebits@quokk.au
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                16 hours ago

                I don’t understand. I was prescribed 5mg at first, and it was less effective than 10mg. I felt it was not working. I’m just sharing my experience. Being that I’m a a larger individual, it takes a higher dose of most things. They might start lower for them—but I don’t want them to write it off if they aren’t experiencing positive results immediately.

                I’m curious what wild imaginary journey you are on that brought you to harassing me. What completely fabricated reality are you experiencing that you feel your comments are acceptable?

                • ZDL@lazysoci.al
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 hours ago

                  You are literally posting in a group whose very first fucking rule is “women only”. And now having had this pointed out to you, instead of shutting the fuck up, you persist in posting against the rules.

                  Telling you you’re in breach of the rules of the group you’re posting to is not “harassment”. It’s telling you you’re breaking the rules. You utter berk.

            • velma@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 day ago

              Oh I didn’t think that was a jab at masculinity. Masculinity can be positive and men and women can express masculinity.

              • kibblebits@quokk.au
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 day ago

                Well, using the word chivalry in 2026 is pretty sexist imo. The definition is more knightly in origin, with another example being men courteous to women. Clearly from another time. I think we can just retire this word—o😚OP seems to be asking for a semantic shift to an already established word. 🤷‍♂️

                • velma@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Absolutely agree on the word chivalry being outdated.

                  Word evolution and etymology are always interesting topics to banter about. Chivalry clearly has a different modern definition than it’s origins. Maybe we could help redefine it further? Or come up with another way of expressing something similar.

                  Like, I think women can be chivalrous. Does that inherently balance the definition or is chivalry always considered a male trait?