• devfuuu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    3 days ago

    We have only had 3 heat waves. Barely even June. Let’s start the real thing now.

  • vrek@programming.dev
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    3 days ago

    Simple solution to all the heat waves…

    Measure in Kelvin. It will now reach a brisk -233 degrees.

    No more worry about heat! The temperature is so much lower!!

    • Skua@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      3 days ago

      I’m afraid that if you ever have a temperature of negative Kelvins, you have somehow invented new physics

      C > K

      40 C is actually 313 K

        • Skua@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          With the disclaimer that antimatter stuff is way beyond my proper physics knowledge, my understanding is that it does not. In fact, antimatter seems to behave pretty much exactly the same as regular matter in every way we’ve tested, it’s just that when it touches regular matter the two violently delete each other from the universe

      • vrek@programming.dev
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        Oh fuck… The entire of Europe is now on fire, the Atlantic ocean and Mediterranean ocean is now boiling… Sorry

      • captain_unicode@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Depending on what you deem “temperature”, that is actually possible :) The physical definition of temperature is the derivative of energy with respect to the entropy. With most physical systems, like gases, if you put in energy, the entropy increases. This happens because if the energy is not bounded from above, the amount of individual states the matter can take always just increases. So the temperature is positive. If the system has a maximum energy, as it can be constructed in some nanophysical systems, the number of reachable states may decrease towards the maximum. So, if you’re in this area, your system technically has negative temperature.

    • vrek@programming.dev
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Btw the Nobel prize can be mailed to 7 main street for this revolutionary idea

  • Ooops@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    36
    ·
    3 days ago

    This time for real or is it the same imaginary heat wave we are talking about for two weeks now and that would have totally roasted us already last weekend… when in reality it was 16°C and raining in mid-June?

      • Ooops@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        This year’s May? The totally normal one with temperatures ~0.4° above average for that month? The one with 93% of the May-average precipitation. The only thing not average about May were the elevated numbers of sunny hours [~+27%) in between the rain. Yet everyone went crazy when there were three warm days of 28° and 29°?

        And now we see the same bullshit. That’s what climate change does. A minor uptick in global temperatures already fucks up weather patterns and lead to more extremes. Yes, that’s bad. But you don’t need to hallucinate getting backed in an oven while it’s cold and you got soaked by rain for the 10th day in a row. People don’t need to make up stuff and totally exaggerate to justify climate change, it’s already very real.

        • kossa@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 days ago

          But May only was average because of extreme weather. In both directions. The heat wave in May was abnormally hot, followed by the cold front you were describing, which was abnormally cold for May. And it doesn’t help the people at risk during heat, that there’s some cold and wet afterwards which cancels out the heat wave oN aVeRaGe.

          And that is the point.

          • Ooops@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            No, the point is that media is talking about an extreme heat wave while I’m freezing my ass off without several layers of clothing. The point is that global warming is not some magical “you are all dying from heat stroke”-event but just a small increase in avarage temperatures wreaking havoc with established weather patterns.

            Yet that is not what is reported. We don’t talk about rain, rain and more rain and low temperatures that are only averaged out by 3 very hot days. We are not talking about extreme weather with regular shifts of +/- 15° from one day to the next. We are instead talking about every single hot day as if it’s the end of the world. And then we are somehow surprised when idiots claim it’s all made up bullshit. Because it is. Start talking about the actual issues, not about some imaginary hot month because there were also a few hot days in that cold period.

            You can’t simplify your argument as absurdum and still think it’s concinving. After the 5th “insane heatwave” report that ended up in just two day of warm weather or none at all, you need to understand that your style of reporting is actually hurting as it gives lunatics valid arguments.