• Fleur_@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 days ago

    That’s an article about weight loss drugs not fasting. Not the brightest are you.

    • tankplanker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 days ago

      Which references impact of weight loss on muscle from multiple studies, not the brightest are you?

      • Fleur_@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 days ago

        So why didn’t you link those ones. Nothing you’ve shown refutes what I’ve said

        • tankplanker@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 days ago

          They are referenced in the article,listed at the bottom, but i don’t expect you to follow anything more complex than a Joe Rogan podcast based on what you shared earlier.

          I’d I was you i would go try to find one of those, you might get lucky and find one that links fasting with raw milk and Ivermectin for insane gains as thats how credible what you have posted so far.

          Your failure to link to anything of actual value says it all.

          • Fleur_@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            12 days ago

            That’s tragic man. Failed to link an article showing what your saying is right, failed to quote from that article to support your point, failed to point out how that proves my source that I provided wrong. Must be embarrassing.

            • tankplanker@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              12 days ago

              Projection much?

              You made outlandish claims, linked to Facebook slop thats so bad I doubt even AI generated it as even AI would remember to link to some fake research in it, still can’t provide even one single scientific paper backing your ridiculous claims, can’t even read a high level summary of multiple papers went sent to you (which has the links at the bottom), published by a major journal.

              Surprised you haven’t pushed paleo, huge quantities of turmeric for muscle health, or something else equally insane.

              • Fleur_@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                12 days ago

                You know what just to flex

                Heres a relevant study. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8308821/

                Heres an interesting part “consensus appears that fat-free and skeletal muscle masses can be preserved, albeit to varying degrees by including both forms of exercise”

                What you’ll notice is that the study I linked contained the information I want to show. Not pointing out for any particular reason or anything.

                • tankplanker@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  12 days ago

                  That really isn’t the flex you think it is, you didn’t read it or you didn’t understand it, did you? You even quoted the helpful bit above for me.

                  It actually supports what I have said from the start, zero muscle loss is an impossible goal without chemical intervention.

                  • Fleur_@aussie.zone
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    12 days ago

                    My point has always been that you shouldn’t be afraid of losing muscle mass while fasting to lose weight as losses are minimal and you can mitigate them. You’ve been arguing tooth and nail against me on this. To what end. Why call out my original source that says more or less the same thing as that article I quoted and that you’ve just admitted is what you agree with. What are you doing.