You must log in or # to comment.
I’m in between 3 and 4: both copyright and copying are amoral (they are just tools), but copyright as it exists today is obsolete, arguably to the point that it actively hinders the betterment of humankind.
In ancient Greece, everyone told stories about Achilles and Odysseus and Perseus.
Now we watch stories about Iron Man and Superman and the Jedi.
The difference is, back then stories belonged to everyone. Now stories belong to billionaires.
Got another option:
Copos had a chance to stop piracy. Netflix demonstrated that. A full all-you-can-watch buffet for €10 a month with everything you need available caused piracy to all but disappear.
Then they got greedy.
Piracy is just as much of a natural result of asshole pricing and market fragmentation as unionization and strikes are a natural result of employers being assholes and underpaying.
I wish piracy was stealing, because stealing from the rich is good
The mental gymnastics people need to do to feel better about getting something for free against the wishes of the creator is so wild.
Just own it.
It’s not always against the wishes of the creators. It’s certainly against the wishes of whoever is making money out of it, and fair enough this is sometimes the creator but more often than not we are talking about a middleman, such as a publisher or big entertainment company.
When I see piracy is depriving the creator of revenue directly, it always feels bad to me.
When I see the creatives have been paid already, or have several income streams (and big ones at that too) and the only ones deprived of profit are the middleman companies… Well…
All of this is overthinking to try and justify it to yourself.
deleted by creator
Copyright is not valid, it is an unjustified form of tyrannical control. Piracy is pushing back against something that isn’t acceptable or justified by refusing to play by their rules.
Anyone who voluntarily supports or apologizes for copyright is neoliberal dirt to me.
