• Lommy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 days ago

      Ik looks like it’s coming out of his original packaging. The value for collectors dropped a lot probably.

  • SailorFuzz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Needlessly gendered, casual sexism. It’s not “people” who are implied to be dumb and impulsive, just men. Cool, very haha.

    EDIT. man, sure are a lot of people who wanna defend sexism. I think the real lesson here is that I should just block people earlier.

    • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      Pretty sure people like their orange cats?

      Also if we’re going by your interpretation of what the poster is meaning it’s not really needlessly gendered. Most people on the site would be young men, and young men statistically make more dumb and impulsive decisions than young women, it’s why we pay more for insurance.

      • Starya67@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        It’s why more boys are born than girls! Because, and I quote my uncle (who works in healthcare) “men are really fucking stupid.”

      • SailorFuzz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Not sure I understand, are you implying that because insurance companies openly discriminate, that means it’s not discrimination? So if a capitalist industry says it’s true, then it’s true?

        Or, are you implying something along the lines to say that men are, by nature, dumber and impulsive? Like it’s some fact of biology measurable by statistics? And not like, some kind of expected role placed on men to fit into society, encouraging them to be brash and aggressive? Boys will by boys and all that.

        But hey, lets abuse statistic and this “by nature” argument a bit more, see how that line of thinking has been used against other groups of people, and see if it feels alight:

        “Women are simply not as smart and are meant to be caring and loving mothers, its in their nature”.

        Hmmmmm, troubling. But statistically, at that time, true. Because women weren’t allowed in higher education and were expected to keep house. So crazy thing, that’s what a large statistic of women did. The weren’t educated and grew up to be housewives as their only skill. And look at that, now I can use the artificially induced statistic as evidence and create this neato little feedback loop until everyone just accepts it an immutable fact of nature.

        It’s almost like… we have this society built on explicit gender roles and expectations. And trying to use those societal pressures as some kind of proof of nature, is pretty fucking dumb, and inherently sexist af. And flipping the roles so as to say “haha men dumb” doesn’t make it any less sexist. And playing this dumb “what do you mean?” game is insincere bullshit.

        • velma@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          Hmmmmm, troubling. But statistically, at that time, true. Because women weren’t allowed in higher education and were expected to keep house. So crazy thing, that’s what a large statistic of women did. The weren’t educated and grew up to be housewives as their only skill. And look at that, now I can use the artificially induced statistic as evidence and create this neato little feedback loop until everyone just accepts it an immutable fact of nature.

          Comparing systemic sexism and centuries of patriarchal suppression of women to a funny tweet that’s akin to the “golden retriever boyfriend” trope sure is a thing you can do.

          • SailorFuzz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            3 days ago

            interesting that you flipped the comparative metaphor to a positive one. Why didn’t you chose a “funny tweet” that’s derogatory? Do they have different connotations and thus are treated differently when discussing issues of discriminatory behaviour?

            • hirihit640@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              16 hours ago

              Not a directly response to your comment, a small observation. imo when grandparent comment said:

              Comparing systemic sexism and centuries of patriarchal suppression of women to a funny tweet

              Then you immediately know they are of the prejudice + power definition of sexism and racism. People on either side of this debate are so hard to convince to the other side that I personally just don’t engage further

              • SailorFuzz@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                3 days ago

                sure man, lets just play pretend that the popularly understood interpretation of a thing is not what’s being implied. I think you’re a bitch… waitwaitwait, I mean that in a positive way, like how bitches are motherly and loyal dogs. Isn’t that what people mean when they say that?

        • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Not sure I understand, are you implying that because insurance companies openly discriminate, that means it’s not discrimination?

          Discrimination usually requires proof of unfair treatment. Insurance companies avoid this by proving these metrics are mathematically and actuarially tied to risk rather than intentional bias.

          Are you denying that young men are less risk adverse than young women, that young men do not injure themselves and others more than young women?

          are you implying something along the lines to say that men are, by nature, dumber and impulsive? Like it’s some fact of biology measurable by statistics?

          Yes… Testosterone is well known to effect mood regulation and decision making, including the ability to control and reflect upon impulsive behaviour.

          line of thinking has been used against other groups of people, and see if it feels alight:

          Yes because falsely equating modern medical science to something like phrenology is totally a legitimate argument…

          Women are simply not as smart and are meant to be caring and loving mothers, its in their nature

          That is making an absolute claim, which is not what I or the original the original post did.

          Also, most all studies agree that women and men both have the same average IQ of around 100, but tend to be better at different aspects of the test.

          The second part of your claim is not really something that can be statically measured? “Women are supposed to be loving mother” as opposed to what exactly? How are we quantifying what a loving mother is?

          The weren’t educated and grew up to be housewives as their only skill.

          More women are seeking higher education then men currently?

          Even your “pretend” sexism is moronic. So I guess you are being a little orange cat brained today.

          It’s almost like… we have this society built on explicit gender roles and expectations.

          It’s almost like you are dramatically over reaching to turn this two sentence post so you can turn this thread into an Incel soapbox about the male loneliness epidemic.

          • SailorFuzz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            3 days ago

            tldr: you really really really wanna justify your sexist views cuz they make with the funny.

            • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              No, just tired of people reaching for the worst excuse that they use to blame their ineptitude and inability to succeed in life.

              You might have a lot going on with your life, you may currently be discriminated against for a number of valid reasons… Being a man is not one of them.

              There is no society on the planet where women currently have more institutional, economic, or social power than men.

              • SailorFuzz@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                7
                ·
                3 days ago

                ah, one of those “only men can be sexist” types.

                I’m not going to play educator with a freshman gender studies edgelord. Do some more reading, get a nuanced view. Manhating is not feminism. Read up on intersectional feminism. You’re one bad view away from being a full fledged TERF.

                • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  7
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  ah, one of those “only men can be sexist” types.

                  Lol, and when did I say that? You can experience someone calling you a derogatory name, or be depicted in a sexist way. What you cannot experience is systemic and life altering sexism that can functionally impede your ability to succeed in society.

                  Do some more reading, get a nuanced view.

                  Right after you work on your reading comprehension…

                  Manhating is not feminism. Read up on intersectional feminism.

                  Hello, it is me…the man hating man. Just because I don’t whine like a little boy anytime someone pokes fun in the direction of my gender, does not mean I hate myself.

                  I’m just not a angsty teenager that tries to equivocate my hurt feelings to the generational systemic sexism experienced by women, a sexism that’s historically been backed by violence on a personal and state level.

                  You’re one bad view away from being a full fledged TERF

                  Wut? Defending women equals me being TERF? Are you implying that trans women are not women?

                  Get the fuck out here dude. What line will you not cross to paint yourself as a victim?

                • AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  3 days ago

                  They were saying that if something is getting you down, if you’re feeling discriminated against, the reason isn’t “because you’re a man”. It would be some other reason.

                  Then you throw some names and condescension.

                  There’s a word for manhating, it’s missandry. I’ve done some reading.

      • Droechai@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 days ago

        No, but its whats implied by “orange cat behaviour”. It has no real foundation in actual cat behaviour research, but its a tag or search term for orange cats doing stupid and/or impulsive things that people upload

        • velma@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          Broadfern’s comment is a more wholesome interpretation that I think describes some boys quite well:

          Cute, friendly, food-motivated, prone to getting into lighthearted mischief, and occasionally doing things with little regard to personal safety because the fun factor is more important.

        • SailorFuzz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          3 days ago

          thank you. That’s exactly what most people mean by “orange cat”: Stupid, impulsive, “sharing one brain cell”.

          Some (very insincere) people rushing in the comments to pretend “nono, that’s not what it means”. Because if it means, what everyone else thinks it to mean, then they’d have admit that they’re a little sexist. Or okay at least with sexist humor targeted at men.

      • SailorFuzz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        A google search away

        Orange Cat Behavior and Orange Cats Share One Brain Cell refers to the widespread notion and cliche that orange (ginger) cats are more chaotic, more affectionate and more stupid than other types of cats.

        • AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          3 days ago

          I didn’t want to know what the Google definition was. I was wondering what YOU specifically thought. Which is that orange cats are chaotic and stupid. I kinda mentioned this in my other comment further down the chain.

          But the logic is orange cat = bad, men = cat, therefore men = bad. Yes? But that’s YOUR personal interpretation. The person in the original pic intentionally left it vague and our minds filled in what we thought should go there.

    • Leah@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      3 days ago

      You’re a sad, incel loser bud. And yes, I am name calling here. No need to debate the obvious. Bet you got offended by the bear too.

      • SailorFuzz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        I’m married to a gothy woman who played rollerderby and could kick my ass, so, no? Sorry I don’t fit your fantasy version that you want to hate. Do some reflecting. In the meantime, uhhh block 🥂

        • velma@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          Incel ideology has come a long way from simply being involuntarily celibate.

          Marrying a woman doesn’t absolve long-held sexist beliefs. Otherwise there would be a lot more men who defend and support women.

    • Wren@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      3 days ago

      No one is implied to be dumb and impulsive. The statement isn’t exclusive to men, or even all men. This is far from sexism, it’s humorously punching up.

      If you’re going to ignore the post and make up your own joke anyway, why don’t you tell us what it is?

  • ikidd@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    I would never have another cat that wasn’t a fixed orange tabby male. Every one of those I’ve ever owned or met have been the smartest and friendliest cats.

    I miss Lexter the Molester. He was awesome. Now we have Jurgy the shop cat, who gives you shit if you aren’t sitting in the chair to give him pets at 3PM for coffee time.

    • naeap@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Same for me

      My last cat was an orange male and he was the most intelligent cat I’ve ever had the honour to meet and love