• GalacticSushi@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Quentin Tarantino making characters that say the N word over and over or are involved in erotic foot fetish scenarios and then casting himself to play those characters.

          • Batmancer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            I don’t know his reasoning and I have no idea what kind of person he is, but I’d rather do something uncomfortable than ask someone to do it.

            • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Nobody had to fucking do it, have you seen Pulp Fiction? It’s an entirely unnecessary, and incredibly lame attempt at a joke

          • Sunsofold@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            He seems more like a guy who never got past the emotional age of 13 than a racist. He probably really loved setting up a situation where he gets to rattle off an edgy, shocking round of nonsense in front of the whole country and giggle as people get offended. Your offense is probably playing into his pleasure more than the particular word he used.

  • WesternInfidels@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Even in pre-history, men were somehow convinced that what women really wanted was: bigger dicks. Bigger dicks than human men could possibly offer.

    It’s such a weird preoccupation, and it seems like it’s got to be deeper than just a cultural thing.

          • ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            written record, it’s clearly history, accuracy disclaimers aside.

            With that definition, isn’t Frodo dumping the One Ring into a vulcano history too?

            • njm1314@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Why did you switch to the word Authority instead of History? Is it because using the word history makes your argument invalid?

              • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                I don’t even have an argument here. Chill.

                You must be so used to people being contrarian that even my sarcastic criticism triggers your aggression or whatever this is.

                Just relax and take a deep breath, nobody here is an enemy.

                I’m merely pointing out an interesting idea that to a lot of (maybe even most, or even all) people, history, and therefore one’s worldview and values, are subjective and based around an authority of some kind.

                No need to make this weirdly personal and hostile, we are only discussing ideas.

                • njm1314@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Wow you’re coming off as super chill and not defensive at all here. Lol.

    • jaybone@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Well obviously there’s a biological and psychological component, which would transcend cultures. Probably goes back to times in our evolution before we were even considered human.

      • wabasso@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        That would explain its robustness across culture and history, but I can’t come up with even a shitty evopsych explanation. Bigger dicks scoop out more of the previous male’s ejaculate??

  • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    BRB, need to make a t-shirt.

    No quote, just:

    Front: a small red and blue GOP donkey with dick out on the top left

    Back: Ezekiel 23:20

  • Jurubeba@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is a disapproval to the woman. I don’t remember exactly (and I don’t want to read it again), but this isn’t a thing that Ezekiel is glorifying, but rather showing how perverse the lady was.

    • starchylemming@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      thats not even the subject of this discussion. the hidden subtext is.

      people argue, the shit is made up to slander some woman for no real reason.

      however the accusation is oddly creative, that can only mean one thing: the author of this verse is into the thing they accuse others of.

      “every accusation is a confession”

      is a common comment whenever a conservative hateful man turns out guilty of commiting crimes they decried of others. this happened so much, its kind of a meme culminating in this thread

  • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    What? I didn’t know they talked about Boeing engineers in the Bible?