But famously this sentiment didn’t last and Napoléon commited to a land war in Russia, which was universally regarded as a bad idea.

There is a slight difference in preparation, though

Next up: kudzu

It’s quite hard to steer a train anywhere else than it’s tracks

Either that or he has a killer appetite

Half of a double? There might be a less verbose term for that.

Wow that’s so rare for an organic item to survive that long

The only people who can truly be replaced by ai are the CEO level people. However they will going to their jobs and have ai do most of them for them.

I’m curious what political agenda they are promoting.

And by ‘curious’ I mean: quite convinced that the knobhead that pushed Brexit and is now fueling right wing hatred is getting a leg up from his buddy in the Kremlin

I’ll take that. But if your own party doesn’t kick you out, your can remain in place till the next election, no? At least that’s what I remember.

I don’t get how this pm is being bullied into resigning, whilst formerly it was ‘there’s no way for this guy to be forced to resign till next elections, deal with it.’

I mean I’m not a fan of Starmer, but Boris literally broke his own laws and the media were just shrugging it.

I really would like an explanation.

He’s not radical at all. He’s very level headed and concerned about climate and people ontrolling the media generally kcik those people out because they oppose their agenda.

But they can’t so that with David. The UK would be in full on civil war if they did that.

For now they get a pass. The sloppyness doesn’t infringe on the content and if Ai can more easily animate heads on period uniforms than the time the rotated 20-odd heads with slightly less period-correct outfits it doesn’t impact things for me.

I’m not that visually engaged, though, and loved their simpler content (like bazzbattles, too). If they start skimping ont the research, though, it will draw the line.

Who touched Sasha?

Who would’ve thought the peace talks would rather after Putin’s victory parade was over and he’s no longer afraid of his party getting spoilt.

It’s pathetic

What happened to ‘not our war’?

The only modicum of some Starmer had left

Yeah I just added a bit of context after reading a couple of articles on the matter. I don’t know if you saw my edit, because I saw your reaction shortly after posting it.

The main takeaway sens to be that the academics aren’t really interested in female sexuality behavior and it isn’t studied.

I have read through a couple of articles that I could relate to the Journal article. Most focus really heavily on the male sexual expression. I could read nothing about female still behavior.

That isn’t strange, researchers focus mainly on the male sexual aspect, as that’s where the money is for sheep farmers.

I am however still searching for the quote about female sexuality, I can’t find it in Perkins, nor Stormshak’s work.

I’m a big fan of Doctorov , but in this case I would like a citation.

I’m making interested to see how the gender of the ewes was determined. I mean if the indicator of sexual attraction is indistinguishable from normal behavior: standing still how could one prove the sheep to be lesbian.

edit after reading through various research I’ve come to the conclusion that the researcher, Perkins, just admitted that there’s no way to study lesbian behavior in ewes, as the have no visible sexual expression (that the researchers know about)

It’s as much a statement of the importance of the researcher as they depend on clear intercourse-like behavior to explain attraction. They can’t see that in ewes, as their sexual behavior is passive. ‘if they don’t hump we can’t tell their sexual preference’

Which is a bit weird as they argue that in males sexual preference is hormonal, so that should register in females too. But that isn’t studied as there’s no interest.

How great! A politician admitting to something!

Sounds like someone with some moral awareness. Let’s get him elected.