Reform’s plan to “prioritise” the siting of migrant detention centres in Green-voting areas would be illegal, experts have told Big Issue.
Reform’s plan to “prioritise” the siting of migrant detention centres in Green-voting areas would be illegal, experts have told Big Issue.
I suspect the policy isn’t intended to actually build detention centres. It will be used to generate lots of daily mail (et al) headlines about green councils not wanting migrants. It also allows them to blame the greens if there’s a story about bad conditions or overcrowding at existing detention centres, “we’d love to build new centres but these meanie greens that claim to love immigrants keep stopping us”. It’s actually kinda genius in an evil way.
They could use a proxy, find something that green councils have the most of (allotments? Universities?) and claim to be using that to site them.
The lords can only delay legislation, they can’t stop it.
I don’t know. That assisted dying bill seems to have been killed off by them.
They can kill a bill for a parliamentary session (1 year), if it’s reintroduced in the following session it can be sent for royal ascent without the lords’ approval. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parliament_Act_1949
Technically the king could refuse ascent, but that hasn’t happened since 1708.
That wasn’t a government bill.