For a community that bills itself as

“General discussions about “science” itself

Be sure to also check out these other Fediverse science communities:”

And is full of news articles explaining science, having a biologist explain the science of sex biology is not a right fight for a general science community.

    • Luminous5481 "Enemy of the State"@anarchist.nexus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      56
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      4 days ago

      I think this probably covers the explanation: https://mander.xyz/comment/27596923

      The goal when creating this instance was to a place to discuss about scientific discoveries, post pictures of nature, and have a set of communities for this while avoiding polarizing content. If someone wants to discuss politics they can click on ‘All’ and go right to it. The scope is explicitly anti-politics because I do not want to moderate a politically charged or polarizing environment, and I know that many people with interests like mine will also appreciate such a space existing because they see enough pictures of Donald Trump and polarizing discussions elsewhere.

      it seems like @[email protected] thinks trans people are too polarizing for his instance. his comments come across as a very “don’t disturb the status quo” kind of liberal. or as I like to call them, a Nazi collaborator. because if you aren’t fighting the fascists in some way, then you’re actively helping them.

      • Mystic Mushroom [Ze/Zir]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        46
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        4 days ago

        Agreed, by choosing to decide arbitrarily that trans people are political and shouldn’t be discussed @[email protected] is helping to further the fascist agenda against trans people. Lots of people don’t know this but the number one way media alienates trans people isn’t by making offensive jokes about us, or invalidating us directly, but by just erasing our existence.

        That’s what gamergate and not wanting queer people in video games and movies is about. They want us to stop existing in the minds of public people.

        • djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          yes yes and yes.

          it’s why trying to ban topics on the basis of being “political” is actually insane. we live in a world where the basic concepts of facts and shared reality are increasingly polarized and politicized. Science as a concept has become political.

      • quill7513@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        The scope is explicitly anti-politics

        real “i don’t do politics, politics do you” energy here

        • ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 days ago

          I look forward to them applying this consistently and banning all biology articles that mention anything relating to sexual reproduction and development. No? Just trans people? Weeeeird… Huh…

      • ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        Maybe I should do it. I should become the first person to make a truly unbiased, “no politics allowed” community. Posting is banned. It will just be a blank page. I look forward to their attentive and continuing viewership.

        • Cricket@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          You could actually do this as a bit because I believe that Lemmy lets you create a community where only the mod(s) can create new posts. You could take this bit pretty far if you wanted to.