• eleitl@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Why would you voluntarily give a company access to you health data, and not expect it to be abused ten times to sunday? They haven’t even secured it properly, so perhaps your health records are being traded on a data black market.

        • xthexder@l.sw0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          14 hours ago

          I had a Samsung smart watch, and it was honestly hard to use without an account. Half the features are locked behind signing in. I stopped using it when weather updates stopped working without logging in.
          Now I have a dumb mechanical watch, and it’s glorious.

          • Art3mis@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Love my dumb watch. Had to get a new smartwatch every 3 years or so due to planned obselesence. Spent the same amount on a pretty citizen and have had it for over 5 years. Hasnt even noticably lost time

        • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Indirect corporate sympathizing is what this is.

          Blame consumers for the abuse and malpractice of corporations who SHOULD be publicly regulated.

          This viewpoint encourages their practices by peddling the same logic these corporations use to continue justifying their practices.

          • partofthevoice@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            12 hours ago

            The logic is just silly. They know exactly why: telemetry is a first class feature in just about any digital consumer based product. We live in a culture defined by consumerism. Social class is defined by what you can consume. Success is defined by your ability to consume more. You gotta have the fancy car, the nice shoes, the biggest house and the best suit.

            Caring about telemetry, what information can be inferred from what data, and what information poses what risks in which entities hands… that line of thinking isn’t popular. Blindly consuming is popular. Showing off your cool new watch is popular.

            The result is that Samsung has health data. This is right in our faces. There are no secrets, no hard puzzles, nothing of that sort. Seeds planted, and now people wonder why they have a bean staulk? Golly.

  • plenipotentprotogod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 day ago

    I have a Samsung phone and I take great pleasure in ignoring the weekly reminders that I still haven’t agreed to their latest privacy policy (or any previous version since the very first one which I was forced to accept while setting up the phone). Refusing to do this probably doesn’t accomplish anything, but it’s my own private act of rebellion while I eagerly await those new Motorola phones with first-party Graphene OS support.

    • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      i hope they are available in my region. it’d be nice to have when planned obsolescence takes mine.

  • solrize@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Sounds ok to me, it’s usually very hard to get data like that deleted. Best to not let them get it in the first place.

  • SteleTrovilo@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    So I can tell them to not use my data, and they’ll also delete it as a bonus?

    Now I wish I’d ever given them any health data, just so I could do this.

  • Flying_Lynx@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 day ago

    >The company plans to grab four categories: your sleep, your medications, your medical records, and your cycle tracking details. The company also said that humans (maybe Samsung employees and third-party contractors) will be able to review some of the data collected.

    For your own sake… let them*

    ^* delete the data that is.^

    • Shellofbiomatter@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      Just curiosity. How the hell is US medical system set up that it’s even possible for a company thats not in any way related to health have acess to medical history and meds?

      Like my countries medical system is fully digitized, but there isn’t even a way for a random company to acess this information.

  • N0x0n@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    Why would any sane person even use this kind of feature? It’s not even that useful :/.

    It’s the kind of thing people think they needed, when actually they dont… Who the fuck needs to know how many steps you did this afternoon? Or how “good” you slept yesterday? How many calories your ate this morning…?

    I haven’t seen a single good use case of this kind of tracking device, except for your insurance/bank…

    • michaelalf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      I use a Garmin watch to track my heart rate and variability, but I have a heart condition, so yeah. I agree with everything else though. “High stress detected” yeah, no shit.

    • Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 day ago

      This isn’t that. People are paying for devices with promised feature sets that have now had their terms changed.

      • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        When I looked into it, the health related smartwatch features that were sold specifically said that they required you to use use, and agree to the terms of service (which says they can cancel the service at any time) of, their specific apps or devices and that the data provided to these services were theirs to do with as they please.

        I thought that was a terrible deal so I didn’t buy one.

        There are smartwatches that let you keep your data, but they require a lot more work to use.

        • TechLich@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Pebble are pretty good.

          They don’t require any work to use, have a battery life measured in weeks, not hours, keep all your health data local unless you very specifically set it up to send it to a health app, and are open source and reasonably priced.

          Not an advertisement. It’s still a US company, but compared with something like a Samsung thing they’re pretty cool.